{"id":65,"date":"2013-02-27T07:14:04","date_gmt":"2013-02-27T15:14:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/intercase.org\/?p=65"},"modified":"2013-03-02T23:52:50","modified_gmt":"2013-03-03T07:52:50","slug":"costs-of-it-in-support-of-accountable-care","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/intercase.org\/?p=65","title":{"rendered":"Costs of IT in support of accountable care"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>We have recently endured another round of reports noting that investment in healthcare IT does not seem to have very significant ROI.\u00a0 We have had redundant reports noting that:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>EMRs may not have significant ROI<\/li>\n<li>HIEs may or may not be &#8220;sustainable&#8221;<\/li>\n<li>Industry IT costs are still trending upward, even though healthcare IT investment is generally lower than other information intensive industries<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>I continue to wonder why buyers are surprised.\u00a0 ROI is fundamentally based on changes in revenue or cost after an implementation.\u00a0 If clinical tool sets do not have much effect on either, why would we expect an ROI?<\/p>\n<p>Perhaps more humorously, in a fee-for-service environment (in which most physicians are still practice), ROI is more commonly driven by better billing characteristics (e.g., better coding on bills, more accurate &#8216;upcoding&#8217;) than by process improvement.\u00a0 In fact, process costs tend to rise in ambulatory care when clinical systems are implemented.<\/p>\n<p>Does anyone think that these reports have any bearing at all on the value of clinical tools when deployed in an accountable care environment?\u00a0 That is, if we are actually economically incentivized to improve the cost\/quality profile, wouldn&#8217;t the investment in care coordination tools have much more obvious value?<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>We have recently endured another round of reports noting that investment in healthcare IT does not seem to have very significant ROI.\u00a0 We have had redundant reports noting that: EMRs &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[5],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/intercase.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/intercase.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/intercase.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/intercase.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/intercase.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=65"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"http:\/\/intercase.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":151,"href":"http:\/\/intercase.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65\/revisions\/151"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/intercase.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=65"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/intercase.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=65"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/intercase.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=65"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}